Author Topic: Infantry or Tanks - Which Should Lead An Attack?  (Read 2598 times)

Ayoshi

  • Timawan
  • Boffin
  • *
  • Posts: 2826
    • View Profile
Infantry or Tanks - Which Should Lead An Attack?
« on: May 31, 2017, 06:33:32 AM »
Infantry or Tanks - Which Should Lead An Attack?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWNMdBj102U

redcomet_m

  • Timawan
  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 21
    • View Profile
Re: Infantry or Tanks - Which Should Lead An Attack?
« Reply #1 on: June 01, 2017, 12:23:25 AM »
Our army was again exposed to rpg/ied attacks this time on an urban setting. In light of the recent Maute terrorist attacks, should up-armoring the tip of the spear in this case the V150 happen?

adroth

  • Administrator
  • Boffin
  • *****
  • Posts: 5888
    • View Profile
    • The ADROTH Project
Re: Infantry or Tanks - Which Should Lead An Attack?
« Reply #2 on: July 03, 2017, 02:50:54 AM »
Infantry or Tanks - Which Should Lead An Attack?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWNMdBj102U

This would really depend on the nature of the engagement. Combined Arms tactics are designed to allow both tanks and infantry to take advantage of each other's strengths. Tanks alone, without the benefit of infantry support, would be vulnerable.

===

Tanks are also not the be all and end-all solution to combat

https://youtu.be/wTU3QeKDc8Y
« Last Edit: July 03, 2017, 03:07:17 AM by adroth »

Ayoshi

  • Timawan
  • Boffin
  • *
  • Posts: 2826
    • View Profile
Re: Infantry or Tanks - Which Should Lead An Attack?
« Reply #3 on: January 26, 2018, 07:50:14 AM »
Back in the old forum, If I call correctly we used to have a dedicated thread where the Pros shared their experience on how they use their armored vehicles in combat...

Officer, nanguna sa operasyon para mabawi ang 2 barangay mula sa Maute-ISIS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ewkVEOlmqC8

V300 FSV in action

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ewkVEOlmqC85